in Stylistics 3rd Full · Peter Verdonk Stylistics · Кухаренко В. А. Kukharenko V. A. A Book of Practice in Stylistics · Types of Stylistics · Galperin. English Stylistics has 38 ratings and 2 reviews. The textbook discusses the general problem of style, gives a stylistic classification of English vocabul. About I.R. Galperin: Ilya Romanovich Galperin ( – ) was a notable linguist, professor of the Moscow State Linguistic University.. I.R. Galperin.
|Published (Last):||7 January 2017|
|PDF File Size:||18.48 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.80 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It is applied to various kinds of literary works: Style in this sense of expression studies4he normalized forms of the language.
It can be recognized by the specific and peculiar galperib tion of language media and stylistic devices which in their interaction present a certain system. After all the origin of the word ‘style’ is a justification for the suggestion.
This tendency became particularly strong in what is called descriptive linguis tics.
In dealing with the objectives of stylistics, certain pronouncements of adjacent disciplines such as theory of information, literature, psychology, logic and to some extent statistics must be touched upon. Chiasmus Reversed Parallel Construction Styylistics Buffon coined his famous saying which, due to its epigrammatical form, became a by-word all over the world, he had in mind the idiolect, i.
Adyusha rated it it was amazing Feb 18, A somewhat bro ader view of style is expressed by Werner Winter who maintains that “A style may be said to be characterized by a pattern of recurrent selections from the inventory of optional features of gapperin language.
The notion of style as embellishment of language is completely erroneous.
SDs and EMs, necessarily touches upon such general language problems as the aesthetic function of language, synonymous ways of galpefin one and the same idea, emotional colouring in language, the interrelation between language and thought, the individual manner of etylistics author in making use of language and a number of other issues. Just as the interrelation between lexicology and lexicography is accepted to be that of theory and practice, so theoretical and practical stylistics should be regarded as two interdependent branches galpetin linguistic science.
It will therefore not come amiss to quote certain interesting observations regarding style made by different writers from different angles. The fact that there are different norms for various types and styles of language does not exclude the possibility and even the necessity of arriving at some abstract notion of norm as an invariant, which should embrace all variants with their most typical properties.
Thus “footsteps on the sand of war” E. This idea is common to many stylists who hold that real and genuine individuality of style will reveal itself not in the breach of the rules, in other words, not in deviating from the accepted norms, but gallerin the peculiar treatment of them.
Galperin I. A. Stylistics
In both cases the reader is faced with difficulties in decoding the message and this greatly hinders understanding. But still all these various definitions leave impression that by and large they all have something in common. As we have already cited, G.
It places the whole problem on a solid foundation of objective-criteria, namely, the interdependence of optional and obligatory features. Some of these ob – servations are dressed up as epigrams or sententious maxims like the ones quoted above. There is compelling evidence in favour of the theory which demands that the two notions should be regarded in their unity, allowing, however, that each of them be subjected to isolated observation.
No matter how style is treated, it is the product of a writer’s deliberate intention to frame his ideas in such a manner as will add something important, something indispensable in order to secure an adequate realization of his ideas. Gvozdev states that “Stylistics has a practical value, teaching students to master the language, working out a conscious approach to language”2 and Lucas declares that the aims of a course in style are: The significance of this branch of linguistics can hardly be over-estimated.
Language-as-a-system may figuratively be depicted as an exploiter of language- in-action. Stylistics, sometimes called lingvo-stylisticsis a branch of general linguistics.
This uniquenessof the individual style of an author is not easy to observe. This system derives its origin from the creative spirit, and elusive though it may seem, it can nevertheless be ascertained. The two objectives of stylistics are clearly discernible as two separate fields of investigation. Newspaper Style written by V. There is no point in quoting other definitions of style.
English Stylistics by I.R. Galperin
These features are conditioned by the general 1 In linguistics there are two terms now generally recognized and widely used — Plan of expression and plan of content literary canons of the period and cannot therefore be neglected. Interjections and Exclamatory Words Undoubtedly all these diversities in the understanding of the word ‘style’ stem from its ambiguity.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Mariane rated it really liked it Jul 17, Interaction of Logical and Emotive Meanings Hill states that “A current definition of style and stylistics is that structures, sequences, and patterns which extend, or may extend, beyond the boundaries of individual sentences define style, and that the study of stypistics is stylistics.
It is important here to call attention to the process of formation of scientific notions. In this connection the following remarks made by L”. The practical side of the problem can hardly be over-estimated. A number of events in the development of stylistics must be mentioned here sgylistics landmarks. The same concerns the issue of functional styles of language.
But language studies cannot avoid subjecting to observation any language data whatever, so where grammar refuses to tread stylistics steps in. Likewise it is perfectly apparent that the norms of emotive prose and those of official language are heterogeneous. The most frequent definition of style is one expressed by Seymour Chatman: Interaction of Primary and Derivative Logical Meanings The phenomena then being collected and classified are hallowed into the ranks of the units of language-as-a-system.
Two American journals appear regularly, which may keep the student informed as to trends in ggalperin theory of stylistics. The analogy is, of course, conventional, but it helps to yalperin the uniqueness of the writer’s idiosyncrasy.